Guide

Tilt table or standing frame? Choosing weight-bearing equipment for neuro-rehab

The difference between a tilt table and a standing frame, which patients each suits, and why most neuro-rehabilitation units end up needing both. Written by a manufacturer of both.

Both get a patient upright. They do it for different patients at different stages, and choosing one when you needed the other is an expensive mistake.

The tilt table: from lying to standing by degrees

A tilt table takes a fully supported, strapped patient from horizontal to near-vertical in controlled increments. It is the tool for the patient who cannot yet stand — after prolonged ICU or bed rest, after spinal or brain injury — because it lets the team find the angle the patient tolerates and build from there, with blood pressure and tolerance monitored at each step. Motorised tilt, hi-low and auto-height variants exist; a version with an activity tray combines tilt with purposeful hand tasks.

The standing frame: upright, hands free, working

A standing frame holds a patient who can tolerate upright posture but cannot hold it unaided — knee block, chest support, tray. Its value is what happens while the patient stands: weight through the legs for bone and circulatory health, trunk work, and hands free for upper-limb tasks. It is cheaper than a tilt table and takes less floor, and it is used far more often once a patient reaches that stage. Paediatric frames are built to a child's proportions, not cut down from an adult unit.

So which one?

Both are in our Stand & Bear Weight range with item codes and 3D models you can turn. Send the caseload description on WhatsApp and we will suggest the configuration.

Questions about anything above: WhatsApp or info@xinixinnovations.com.